• |
Pandawa Logo

Scopus CiteScore 2025

2.1

Calculated on 05 May, 2025

SJR 2025

0.25

Powered by scimagojr.com

Language

Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Natural Science

ISSN (eletronic): 2774-3047


Vol. 6 Issue 2 (2026) Articles https://doi.org/10.47352/jmans.2774-3047.378

Metabolite Profiling and Preliminary Biological Assessment of Sandoricum koetjape (Burm. f.) Merr. Bark Extracts from Pekanbaru, Indonesia

Nur Anisa Berry Juliandi Silmi Mariya Kanthi Arum Widayati Tri Heru Widarto

Author information

Nur Anisa

https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9145-3964

Author information

Berry Juliandi

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0348-5675

Author information

Silmi Mariya

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6714-1276
  • mariyasilmi@gmail.com
  • Primate Research Center, IPB University, Bogor-16151 (Indonesia)
  • Biography not informed.

Author information

Kanthi Arum Widayati

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0536-5100
  • kanthiarum@gmail.com
  • Department of Biology, IPB University, Bogor-16680 (Indonesia)
  • Biography not informed.

Author information

Tri Heru Widarto

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7281-487X
  • theru@apps.ipb.ac.id
  • Department of Biology, IPB University, Bogor-16680 (Indonesia)
  • Biography not informed.

Available online: April 12, 2026

[1]
N. Anisa, B. Juliandi, S. Mariya, K. A. Widayati, and T. H. Widarto, “Metabolite Profiling and Preliminary Biological Assessment of Sandoricum koetjape (Burm. f.) Merr. Bark Extracts from Pekanbaru, Indonesia”, J. Multidiscip. Appl. Nat. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1112–1130, Apr. 2026.

Abstract

Sandoricum koetjape (Burm. f.) Merr. is a tropical medicinal plant traditionally used in Southeast Asia; however, information on the metabolite composition and biological properties of its bark remains limited. This study aimed to characterize the metabolite profile of S. koetjape bark extracts obtained using solvents of different polarity and to conduct an initial evaluation of their biological activities. Bark samples collected from Pekanbaru, Indonesia, were extracted using n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and ethanol, and then followed by LC-MS/MS analysis. A total of 56 metabolites were identified, with triterpenoid-type compounds predominating in the ethyl acetate and ethanolic extracts, while sesquiterpenoid constituents were more characteristic of the n-hexane extract. Antioxidant activity was assessed using the DPPH radical scavenging assay, revealing that the ethanolic extract exhibited the strongest activity (IC₅₀ = 32.53 µg mL⁻¹), followed by the ethyl acetate extract (IC₅₀ = 103.73 µg mL⁻¹), while the n-hexane extract showed negligible activity within the tested range. Initial toxicity screening using the brine shrimp lethality test indicated that the ethanolic extract demonstrated higher toxicity (LC₅₀ = 94.93 µg mL⁻¹) compared with the other extracts. Overall, this study provides baseline phytochemical and preliminary biological data on S. koetjape bark extracts, highlighting solvent-dependent metabolite profiles and initial bioactivity patterns. These findings support further targeted pharmacological and mechanistic investigations of bioactive constituents from this plant.

References

Paper information

Funding data