Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Natural Science
##plugins.themes.gdThemes.journalSlogan##
Scopus CiteScore 2024
4.8
Calculated on 05 May, 2025
SJR 2024
0.31
Powered by scimagojr.com
##plugins.themes.gdThemes.journalSlogan##
4.8
Calculated on 05 May, 2025
0.31
Powered by scimagojr.com
https://doi.org/10.47352/jmans.2774-3047.354
Hogan Eighfansyah Susilo
Poki Agung Budiantoro
Ery Fitrianingsih
Hasan Mayditia
Eriko Nasemudin Nasser
Adi Farmasiantoro
Ahmad Fauzi
Widodo Slamet
Andi Mukhtar Tahir
Nindhita Pratiwi
Magnetic cleanliness is essential for small satellites carrying sensitive payloads such as magnetometers and particle detectors. Reaction wheel assemblies (RWAs) represent a primary source of stray magnetic fields, requiring effective shielding under strict mass and volume constraints. This study uses three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEM) in ANSYS Maxwell to evaluate the shielding effectiveness (SE) of high-permeability alloys (Mu-metal and Permalloy 80) and low-carbon steels (AISI 1008/1010) at thicknesses of 1–3 mm, with aluminum 6061-T6 as a non-magnetic baseline, within a cylindrical RWA enclosure geometry. Results reveal a critical design trade-off: High-permeability alloys provide superior attenuation (>65 dB at 100 mm; residual field <150 nT) and high mass efficiency (>700 dB/kg) but saturate at low flux density (0.8 T) and are costly. Low-carbon steels offer moderate SE (34–40 dB) with far higher saturation tolerance (2.2 T), structural robustness, and lower cost. Thickness scaling shows diminishing returns beyond 2 mm for high-permeability materials, whereas steels improve more linearly. Rather than proposing a new shielding concept, this study applies an integrated FEM-based evaluation approach for small satellite platforms to consistently assess shielding effectiveness, nonlinear saturation behavior, thickness scaling, and mass efficiency of candidate materials within a reaction-wheel-representative geometry under identical boundary conditions.
[1] A. Elshaal, M. Okasha, E. Sulaeman, A. H. Jallad, W. Faris Aizat, and A. B. Alzubaidi. (2024). "Structural Analysis of AlAinSat-1 CubeSat". The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences. 27 (3): 532-546. 10.1016/j.ejrs.2024.06.006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2024.06.006[2] A. Sanny, P. Gatkine, L. García Varela, H. García Vázquez, F. G. Témich, L. F. Rodríguez Ramos, N. Jovanovic, H. P. Stahl, and J. W. Arenberg. (2025). "Towards space-qualification of astrophotonic devices in the optical/IR". the UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts XII.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3065543[3] P. S. Narvaez. (2018). In: "Handbook of Aerospace Electromagnetic Compatibility". Wiley. 621-672. 10.1002/9781119082880.ch12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119082880.ch12[4] R. H. Triharjanto, W. Hasbi, A. Widipaminto, M. Mukhayadi, and U. Renner. (2004). "LAPAN-TUBSAT: Micro-Satellite Platform for Surveillance and Remote Sensing". Proceedings of the 4S Symposium: Small Satellites, Systems and Services (ESA SP-571). La Rochelle, France.
[5] S. Hardhienata, R. H. Triharjanto, and M. Mukhayadi. (2011). "LAPAN-A2: Indonesian Near-Equatorial Surveillance Satellite". Proceedings of the 18th Asia-Pacific Regional Space Agency Forum (APRSAF). Singapore.
[6] W. Hasbi and Suhermanto. (2013). "Development of LAPAN-A3/IPB Satellite: An Experimental Remote Sensing Microsatellite". Proceedings of the 34th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing (ACRS 2013).
[7] M. Mukhayadi, R. Madina, and U. Renner. (2014). "Attitude Control of Bias Momentum Micro-Satellite Using Magnetic and Gravity Gradient Torque". Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Aerospace Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (ICARES). 132-136. 10.1109/ICARES.2014.7024395
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARES.2014.7024395[8] M. A. Saifudin and M. Mukhayadi. (2015). "Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS) of LAPAN-A2/ORARI Satellite". Media Dirgantara. 39-46.
[9] M. Mukhayadi. (2021). "Efficient and High Precision Momentum Bias Attitude Control for Small Satellites". Technische Universität Berlin.
[10] S. Utama, P. R. Hakim, and M. Mukhayadi. (2019). "Quarter Orbit Maneuver Using Magnetorquer to Maintain Spacecraft Angular Momentum". 284 : 012046. 10.1088/1755-1315/284/1/012046
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/284/1/012046[11] X. Chen, S. Liu, T. Sheng, Y. Zhao, and W. Yao. (2019). "Satellite Layout Optimization Design Approach for Minimizing the Residual Magnetic Flux Density of Micro- and Nanosatellites". Acta Astronautica. 163 : 299-306. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.12.006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.12.006[12] E. Carrubba, A. Junge, F. Marliani, and A. Monorchio. (2014). "Particle Swarm Optimization for Multiple Dipole Modeling of Space Equipment". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 50. 10.1109/TMAG.2014.2334277.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2014.2334277[13] A. Giordani, G. M. Mongini, and E. Scione. (2024). "Magnetic Cleanliness Management in Small Satellites". Proceedings of the International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC Europe 2024). 98-103. 10.1109/EMCEurope59828.2024.10722399
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCEurope59828.2024.10722399[14] C. Jager. (2017). "Determination and Compensation of Magnetic Dipole Moment in Application for a Scientific Nanosatellite Mission". KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
[15] A. Lassakeur and C. Underwood. (2019). "Magnetic Cleanliness Program on CubeSats for Improved Attitude Stability". Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST). 123-129. 10.1109/RAST.2019.8767816
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RAST.2019.8767816[16] T. Inamori, N. Sako, and S. Nakasuka. (2011). "Magnetic Dipole Moment Estimation and Compensation for an Accurate Attitude Control in Nano-Satellite Missions". Acta Astronautica. 68 : 2038-2046. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.10.022.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.10.022[17] A. Annenkova, N. Abdelrahman, D. Ivanov, D. Roldugin, and D. Pritykin. (2020). "CubeSat Magnetic Atlas and In-Orbit Compensation of Residual Magnetic Dipole". Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2020).
[18] A. Nicolai, S. Stoltz, O. Hillenmaier, J. Ludwig, C. Strauch, D. Grivon, L. Rossini, E. Onillon, T. Hellwig, and S. Scheiding. (2019). "Towards a Magnetically Clean Reaction Wheel with Active Magnetic Field Mitigation". ESA Workshop on Aerospace Electromagnetic Compatibility. 10.23919/AeroEMC.2019.8788947.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/AeroEMC.2019.8788947[19] D. A. Nicolai. (2019). "Magnetic Field Mitigation Strategies Towards a Magnetically Clean Reaction Wheel".
[20] S. Yang, X. Zhang, J. Gao, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, and X. Xi. (2022). "FEA Simulations for Low-Frequency Multi-Layer Magnetically Shielded Rooms". AIP Advances. 12 (8): 085325. 10.1063/5.0093443.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0093443[21] X. Xu, W. Liu, Y. Huang, W. Li, and S. Che. (2023). "Magnetic Shielding Mechanism and Structure Design of Composites at Low Frequency: A Review". Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 570 : 170509. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170509.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170509[22] S. Utama, D. El Amin, M. A. Saifudin, M. F. Huzain, W. Roza, C. T. Judianto, and M. Mukhayadi. (2024). "Magnetic Shielding Implementation in the Small Satellite Reaction Wheel". INCAS Bulletin. 16 (1): 107-116. 10.13111/2066-8201.2024.16.1.11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2024.16.1.11[23] S. He and J. Zheng. (2024). "Magnetic Shielding Design for the Carriage Structure of Superconducting EDS Transport System". IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 34 (8): 1-4. 10.1109/TASC.2024.3420292.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2024.3420292[24] N. Shen, X. Zhang, Q. Liao, and M. Zhang. (2017). "Design and Experimental Analysis of Magnetic Shielding of Electronic-Magnetic Rail Gun Ammunition Fuse". International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics. 53 (2): 337-358. 10.3233/JAE-160060.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-160060[25] P. Narvaez. (2004). In: "Cassini–Huygens Mission". Kluwer Academic Publishers. 385-394. 10.1007/978-1-4020-2774-1_5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2774-1_5[26] M. G. Kivelson, X. Jia, K. A. Lee, C. A. Raymond, K. K. Khurana, M. O. Perley, and L. Wigglesworth. (2023). "The Europa Clipper Magnetometer". Space Science Reviews. 219 : 48. 10.1007/s11214-023-00989-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-023-00989-5[27] K. Dang, P. Narvaez, J. Berman, K. Pham, and A. Curiel. (2020). "Magnetic Shielding Concepts for Reaction Wheel Assembly on NASA Europa Clipper Spacecraft". IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Signal and Power Integrity (EMC+SIPI). 305-311. 10.1109/EMCSI38923.2020.9191616.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCSI38923.2020.9191616[28] S. S. Grabchikov, A. V. Trukhanov, S. V. Trukhanov, I. S. Kazakevich, A. A. Solobay, V. T. Erofeenko, N. A. Vasilenkov, O. S. Volkova, and A. Shakin. (2016). "Effectiveness of the Magnetostatic Shielding by the Cylindrical Shells". Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 398 : 49-53. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.08.122.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.08.122[29] T. Liu, A. Schnabel, L. Li, Z. Sun, and J. Voigt. (2016). "Impact of Circular Apertures on Static Shielding Performances of Spherical Magnetic Shields". IEEE Magnetics Letters. 11 : 1-5. 10.1109/LMAG.2020.3042135.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LMAG.2020.3042135[30] A. Mager. (1970). "Magnetic Shields". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 6 (1): 67-75. 10.1109/TMAG.1970.1066714.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.1970.1066714[31] X. Yang, Z. Zhang, F. Ning, C. Jiao, and L. Chen. (2020). "Shielding Effectiveness Analysis of the Conducting Spherical Shell with a Circular Aperture against Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields". IEEE Access. 8 : 79844-79850. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988709.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988709[32] E. Baum and J. Bork. (1991). "Systematic Design of Magnetic Shields". Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 101 (1-3): 69-74. 10.1016/0304-8853(91)90682-Z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(91)90682-Z[33] Y. Gao, X. Fang, D. Ma, B. Sun, K. Wang, S. Li, Y. Dou, and M. Zeng. (2024). "Analysis and Measurement of Magnetic Noise in a Multilayer Magnetic Shielding System Combined with Mu-Metal and Ferrite for Atomic Sensors". Measurement. 233 : 114745. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114745.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114745[34] Y. Liu, J. Yang, F. Cao, X. Zhang, and S. Zheng. (2024). "Enhancement of Magnetic Shielding Based on Low-Noise Materials, Magnetization Control, and Active Compensation: A Review". Materials (Basel). 17 (22). 10.3390/ma17225469.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225469[35] S. Firdosy, N. Ury, K. Dang, P. S. Narvaez, R. P. Dillon, and V. A. Ravi. (2023). "Additively Manufactured High-Permeability Fe-Ni Alloys and Novel Bi-Metallic Magnetic Shields". Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 171049. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171049.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171049[36] A. E. M. Mohamed, J. Zou, R. Sheridan, K. Bongs, and M. M. Attallah. (2020). "Magnetic Shielding Promotion via the Control of Magnetic Anisotropy and Thermal Post-Processing in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Processed NiFeMo-Based Soft Magnet". Additive Manufacturing. 32 : 101079. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101079.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101079[37] Q. Meng, Z. Wang, Q. Lin, D. Ju, X. Liang, and D. Xian. (2024). "Theoretical Analysis of a Magnetic Shielding System Combining Active and Passive Modes". Nanomaterials. 14 (6): 538. 10.3390/nano14060538.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14060538[38] S. Yu, J. Sun, H. Zhang, B. Han, and Z. Yang. (2025). "Analysis of Passive Shielding Performance Stability in Hybrid Magnetic Shielding Devices". Applied Sciences. 15 (24): 13173. 10.3390/app152413173.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app152413173[39] J. Victoria, A. Suarez, P. A. Martinez, A. Amaro, A. Alcarria, J. Torres, R. Herraiz, V. Solera, V. Martinez, and R. Garcia-Olcina. (2024). "Advanced Characterization of a Hybrid Shielding Solution for Reducing Electromagnetic Interferences at Board Level". Electronics. 13 (3): 598. 10.3390/electronics13030598.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13030598[40] X. Xu, W. Liu, Z. Zhao, Y. Huang, and T. Zhu. (2024). "Efficient Magnetic Shielding by Designing Layered Composites with Nanocrystalline and Permalloy for Weak Magnetic Measurement". Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 375 : 115538. 10.1016/j.sna.2024.115538.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2024.115538[41] A. Getman. (2023). "Improving the Technology for Ensuring the Magnetic Cleanliness of Small Spacecraft". Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 123 (5). 10.15587/1729-4061.2023.282444.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.282444[42] D. Cristina, U. Gheorghe, B. Gheorghe, and O. Radu. (2012). "Numerical simulation of the sensorless control for an electrical drive system with brushless DC servomotor". the 2012 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPE.2012.6463902[43] O. C. Zienkiewicz, R. L. Taylor, and J. Z. Zhu. (2013). "The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals". Elsevier. Oxford, United Kingdom.
[44] C. Hazard and S. Lohrengel. (2002). "A Singular Field Method for Maxwell's Equations: Numerical Aspects for 2D Magnetostatics". SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 40 (3): 1021-1040. 10.1137/s0036142900375761.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142900375761[45] C. D. Munz, P. Ommes, and R. Schneider. (2000). "A three-dimensional finite-volume solver for the Maxwell equations with divergence cleaning on unstructured meshes". Computer Physics Communications. 130 (1-2): 83-117. 10.1016/s0010-4655(00)00045-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(00)00045-X[46] E. M. Clements, R. Das, M.-H. Phan, L. Li, V. Keppens, D. Mandrus, M. Osofsky, and H. Srikanth. (2018). "Magnetic field dependence of nonlinear magnetic response and tricritical point in the monoaxial chiral helimagnet Cr1/3NbS2". Physical Review B. 97 (21). 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.214438.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.214438