Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Natural Science
##plugins.themes.gdThemes.journalSlogan##
Scopus CiteScore 2024
4.8
Calculated on 05 May, 2025
SJR 2024
0.31
Powered by scimagojr.com
##plugins.themes.gdThemes.journalSlogan##
4.8
Calculated on 05 May, 2025
0.31
Powered by scimagojr.com
https://doi.org/10.47352/jmans.2774-3047.301
Nindhita Pratiwi
Dhani Herdiwijaya
Nizam Ahmad
Taufiq Hidayat
Muhammad Isnaenda Ikhsan
Solar radiation pressure (SRP) can influence the orbital parameters of a satellite, affecting its trajectory and orbital stability. In this study, we analyze the effects of SRP on a real geostationary communication satellite using both spherical and flat models. We use three different articulation schemes: fixed solar panels (model 0), solar panels rotating about a single axis to track the Sun (model 1), and solar panels rotating about two axes for perfect Sun tracking (model 2). Among the three articulation models, model 2 showed the best overall performance with the smallest variations in SRP area (3.56%), SRP-induced force (6.44%), and torque (16.15%) due to better Sun alignment. Model 0 (fixed panels) exhibited the largest variations in SRP area (14.53%) and SRP-induced force (9.69%) but maintained stable orbital energy (0.0029%) and acceleration (0.02%). Model 1 (single-axis tracking) offered moderate improvement but had the highest torque variation (56.87%), which may affect long-term stability. Our modeling indicates that the orbital parameters of the spherical and flat models are generally similar, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9 or better. Additionally, we calculated the differences between the two models for each orbital parameter over the 10 years. The maximum differences observed are 0.022 km for the semi-major axis, 0.000017° for inclination, 0.000045 for eccentricity, 358.34° for the argument of perigee, 0.000018° for the right ascension of the ascending node, and 357.66° for the mean anomaly. We also assessed the agreement between the models and real data, showing that almost all orbital parameters for both models exhibit similar patterns to those of the real data.
[1] B. Duan, and U. Hugentobler. (2021). “Enhanced solar radiation pressure model for GPS satellites considering various physical effects”. GPS Solutions. 25. 10.1007/s10291-020-01073-z
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01073-z[2] A. Mostafa, M. I. El-Saftawy, E. I. Abouelmagd, and M. A. Lopez. (2020). “Controlling the perturbations of solar radiation pressure on the Lorentz spacecraft”. Symmetry. 12 (9): 1423. 10.3390/sym12091423
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091423[3] S. Lupu, and E. Zaharescu. (2014). “Effects of direct and indirect solar radiation pressure in orbital parameters of GPS satelittes”. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii Ovidius Constanta, Seria Matematica. 22 (2): 141-150. 10.2478/auom-2014-0039
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/auom-2014-0039[4] Z. Li, and M. Ziebart. (2020). “Uncertainty analysis on direct solar radiation pressure modeling for GPS IIR and Galileo FOC satellites”. Advances in Space Research. 66 (4). 10.1016/j.asr.2020.04.050
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.04.050[5] E. R. Burnett, and H. Schaub. (2021). “Spacecraft formation and orbit control using differential attitude-dependent solar radiation pressure”. Advances in Space Research. 67 (11). 10.1016/j.asr.2020.03.047
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.03.047[6] D. Henry. (2006). “Robust fault diagnosis of the Microscope satellite micro-thrusters”. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 6 : 342-347. 10.3182/20060829-4-CN-2909.00056
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3182/20060829-4-CN-2909.00056[7] I. Jean, A. Ng, and A. K. Misra. (2019). “Impact of solar radiation pressure modeling on orbital dynamics in the vicinity of binary asteroids”. Acta Astronautica. 165. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.003[8] J. A. Paris. (2006). “The effects of using solar radiation pressure to alleviate fuel requirements for orbit changing and maintenance of the DSCS II F-13 satellite”. Master’s thesis Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: Department of the Air Force, Air University. 155.
[9] D. G. Cook. (2001). “Solar radiation pressure modeling issues for high altitude satellites”. Master’s thesis. Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: Department of the Air Force, Air University. 148.
[10] X. Chang, B. Mannel, and H. Schuh. (2021). “An analysis of a priori and empirical solar radiation pressure models for GPS satellites”. Advances in Geosciences. 55 : 33-45. 10.5194/adgeo-55-33-2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-55-33-2021[11] L. Tang, J. Wang, H. Zhu, M. Ge, A. Xu, and H. Schuh. (2021). “A comparative study on the solar radiation pressure modeling in GPS precise orbit determination”. Remote Sensing. 13 (17): 3388. 10.3390/rs13173388
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173388[12] N. Pratiwi, and D. Herdiwijaya. (2022). “Solar radiation pressure on LAPAN A1 satellite due to extreme geomagnetic storm”. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2243 (1): 012013. 10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012013[13] A. R. Fogg, C. M. Jackman, I. Coco, L. D. Rooney, D. M. Weigt, and M. Lester. (2023). “Why are some solar wind pressure pulses followed by geomagnetic storms?” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 128 (8). 10.1029/2022JA031259
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031259[14] M. A. Yousef, M. I. El-Saftawy, and A. Mostafa. (2022). “Balancing the effects of solar radiation pressure on the orbital elements of a spacecraft using Lorentz force”. Scientific Reports. 12 (1). 10.1038/s41598-022-20166-y
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20166-y[15] D. Mishne, and E. Edlerman. (2017). “Collision-avoidance maneuver of satellites using drag and solar radiation pressure”. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 40 (5). 10.2514/1.G002376
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002376[16] M. I. Rashed, and H. Bang. (2022). “A study of autonomous small satellite constellations for disaster management and deep space strategy”. Remote Sensing. 14 (23): 6148. 10.3390/rs14236148
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14236148[17] K. Vielberg, and J. Kusche. (2020). “Extended forward and inverse modeling of radiation pressure accelerations for LEO satellites”. Journal of Geodesy. 94 (4). 10.1007/s00190-020-01368-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01368-6[18] A. Farres, C. Webster, and D. Folta. (2018). “High fidelity modeling of SRP and its effect on the relative motion of Starshade and WFIRST”. Proceedings of the Space Flight Mechanics Meeting. 2227. 10.2514/6.2018-2227
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-2227[19] C. P. Newman, J. R. Hollister, D. C. Davis, and E. M. Zimovan-Spreen. (2022). “Investigating Solar Radiation Pressure Modeling for Operations in Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit”. Proceedings of the Astrodynamics Specialists Conference. 10382.
[20] D. A. Vallado. (2007). “Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, 3rd ed”. Springer, Berlin.
[21] M. Lachut, and J. Bennett. (2016). “Towards Relaxing the Spherical Solar Radiation Pressure Model for Accurate Orbit Predictions”. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference. 49.
[22] P. Kelly, R. S. Erwin, R. Bevilacqua, and L. Mazal. (2016). “Solar Radiation Pressure Applications on Geostationary Satellites”. GNC AAS Conference. 16 (012).
