Waterbird Checklist, Threats, and Opportunities for Wetlands Ecosystems in Sukamara Regency, Central Kalimantan

Authors

  • Agusti Randi Nusantara Climate Initiative, South Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Barakalla Robyn Nusantara Climate Initiative, South Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Adhy Maruli Nusantara Climate Initiative, South Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Oby Andrean Natai Ekosistem Sejahtera, Sukamara, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
  • Rodianto Rodianto Kandelia Alam, Pontianak, West Kalimantan, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Muammar Kadafi Biology Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Palangka Raya University, Palangka Raya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47352/jbrnt.2964-0431.436

Keywords:

Waterbird diversity, Peat swamp ecosystems, Wetland conservation, Sukamara Regency, Ecosystem services

Abstract

Tropical wetlands are among the most important yet increasingly threatened ecosystems in Southeast Asia, providing critical habitat for biodiversity and essential ecosystem services for local communities. However, information on waterbird assemblages in many peatland landscapes of Borneo remains limited, constraining effective conservation planning. This study presents a preliminary assessment of waterbird diversity, associated threats, and landscape management opportunities in the Bakung River wetlands landscape, Sukamara Regency, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Field observations recorded 28 waterbird species belonging to 10 families, including 17 migratory species and several taxa of national and global conservation concern. The findings indicate that the seasonal hydrological dynamics of the Bakung River create an extensive mosaic of open swamp habitats that function as important feeding, resting, and refuge areas for resident and migratory waterbirds. Despite its ecological significance, the landscape is exposed to multiple anthropogenic pressures, particularly recurrent peat fires, canal-driven hydrological disturbance, and destructive fishing practices that may reduce habitat quality and ecosystem resilience. Based on these results, we highlight the need for an integrated landscape approach that combines habitat protection, peatland and hydrological restoration, regulation of unsustainable resource use, and long-term biodiversity monitoring. In addition, innovative sustainable financing mechanisms, including ecotourism and other schemes related to environmental services may provide complementary pathways to support conservation implementation while sustaining local livelihoods. This study underscores the strategic importance of the Bakung River landscape as a wetland refuge for waterbirds in Borneo and provides an initial scientific basis for future ecological research and ecosystem-based management in the region.

References

[1] Lestari M, Andarini D, Camelia A, Novrikasari N, Nandini RF, Fujianti P. Wetland fires and its environmental conditions. J Ilmu Lingkung. 2021;19(1):21–28. org/10.14710/jil.19.1.21-28

[2] Kurniawan E, Harianto SP, Rusita R. Studi wisata pengamatan burung (birdwatching) di lahan basah Desa Kibang Pacing Kecamatan Menggala Timur Kabupaten Tulang Bawang Provinsi Lampung. J Sylva Lestari. 2017;5(1):35–46.

[3] Khalil A, Mulyani Y, Mardiastuti A, Iswandaru D. Diversity of waterbirds in mudflat and fishpond habitats in coastal wetlands of East Lampung, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;948(1):012025. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/948/1/012025

[4] Tran DB, Matusch T. Restoration of Melaleuca Swamp Ecosystem for Bird Diversity in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. MOJ Ecol Environ Sci. 2017;2(6). https://doi.org/10.15406/mojes.2017.02.00040

[5] Isa NL, Kusneti M, Nugroho RA. Bird diversity of the wetland area in Suwi River, Muara Ancalong, Kutai Timur, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia. F1000Research. 2018;7:1587. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16251.1

[6] Goenner C, Schwarz S, Budiono, Kreb D, Soeyitno A. Waterbird population dynamics in the Middle Mahakam wetlands of East Kalimantan over 23 years. Kukila. 2014;17(2):100.

[7] Miettinen J, Liew SC. Status of peatland degradation and development in Sumatra and Kalimantan. Ambio. 2010;39:394–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0051-2

[8] Choy YK, Onuma A. The tropical peatlands in Indonesia and global environmental change: a multi-dimensional system-based analysis and policy implications. Reg Sci Environ Econ. 2025;2(3):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/rsee2030017

[9] Harrison ME, Deere NJ, Imron MA, Nasir D, Adul, Asti HA, et al. Impacts of fire and prospects for recovery in a tropical peat forest ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024;121(17). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2307216121

[10] Posa MRC. Peat swamp forest avifauna of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia: effects of habitat loss and degradation. Biol Conserv. 2011;144(10):2548–2556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.015

[11] Jepson P, Ladle RJ. Bird-keeping in Indonesia: conservation impacts and the potential for substitution-based conservation responses. Oryx. 2005;39(4):442. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605305001110

[12] Yong DL, Kee JY, Aung PP, Jain A, Yeap CA, Au NJ, et al. Conserving migratory waterbirds and the coastal zone: the future of Southeast Asia’s intertidal wetlands. Oryx. 2021;56(2):176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605320001374

[13] Ramdhan M, Siregar ZA. Pengelolaan wilayah gambut melalui pemberdayaan masyarakat desa pesisir di kawasan hidrologis gambut Sungai Katingan dan Sungai Mentaya Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. J Segara. 2018;14(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/segara.v14i3.6416

[14] Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH. Bird census techniques. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2000.

[15] Wetlands International. Waterbird population estimates. 5th ed. Wageningen: Wetlands International; 2010.

[16] MacKinnon J, Phillipps K, van Balen B. Burung-burung di Sumatera, Jawa, Bali, dan Kalimantan. Bogor: Puslitbang Biologi LIPI; 2010.

[17] Aarif K, Nefla A, Muzaffar S, Musammilu K, Prasadan P. Traditional fishing activities enhance the abundance of selected waterbird species in a wetland in India. Avian Res. 2017;8(1). DOI 10.1186/s40657-017-0073-6

[18] Laubhan M, Gammonley J. Density and foraging habitat selection of waterbirds breeding in the San Luis Valley of Colorado. J Wildl Manage. 2000;64(3):808. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802751

[19] Harrison ME, Ottay JB, D’Arcy L, Cheyne SM, Anggodo A, Belcher CM, et al. Tropical forest and peatland conservation in Indonesia: challenges and directions. People Nat. 2019;2(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10060

[20] Harrison ME, Deere NJ, Imron MA, Nasir D, Adul, Asti HA, et al. Impacts of fire and prospects for recovery in a tropical peat forest ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024;121(17). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2307216121

[21] Asselen S van, Verburg PH, Vermaat JE, Janse JH. Drivers of wetland conversion: a global meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081292

[22] Yunus M, Pagdee A, Baral H. Economic value of peatland ecosystem services and people-peatland landscape interplay: a case study from Sumatra, Indonesia. Preprints. 2023.

[23] Humami DW, Sujono PAW, Muzaki FK, Fadhlillah AP, Drianto E, Lestari YI. Diversity and feeding guild of birds along gradient of revegetated area in karst ecosystem: a case study from Rembang, Central Java. Biosaintifika. 2022;14(3):373. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v14i3.36531

[24] Green AJ, Elmberg J. Ecosystem services provided by waterbirds. Biol Rev. 2014;89(1):105–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12045

[25] Rana MS, Hossain T. Analysing the economic valuation of migratory bird-watching and prospective sustainable marketing strategies of bird tourism in Bangladesh. Afr J Bus Econ Dev. 2022;2(6):19–31.

[26] Schuyt K, Brander L. The economic values of the world’s wetlands. WWF; 2004.

[28] Wunder S. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecol Econ. 2015;117:234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016

[29] Jalilov SM, Rochmayanto Y, Hidayat DC, Raharjo JT, Mendham D, Langston JD. Unveiling economic dimensions of peatland restoration in Indonesia: a systematic literature review. Ecosyst Serv. 2025;71:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101693

[30] Silalahi M, Nurrochmat DR, Harrison RD, Mansur I, Walsh TA. Making the implementation of the multi-forestry business (MUK) policy work in Indonesia. BIO Web Conf. 2025;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202517506010

[31] Glenk K, Martin-Ortega J. The economics of peatland restoration. J Environ Econ Policy. 2018;7(4):345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2018.1434562

[32] BIOFIN-UNEP. Exploring biodiversity credits to boost financing for nature in Indonesia, Philippines, and Thailand. UNDP; 2024.

[33] Deutz A, Heal GM, Niu R, Swanson E, Townshend T, Zhu L, et al. Financing nature: closing the global biodiversity financing gap. The Paulson Institute, The Nature Conservancy, and Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability; 2020.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Randi, A., Robyn, B., Maruli, A., Andrean, O., Rodianto, R., & Kadafi, A. M. (2026). Waterbird Checklist, Threats, and Opportunities for Wetlands Ecosystems in Sukamara Regency, Central Kalimantan. Journal of Biotropical Research and Nature Technology, 4(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.47352/jbrnt.2964-0431.436